Thread:Slimeboy460/@comment-29318633-20161005221056/@comment-26111094-20161017220920

No, what I am meaning by "Traitor trials" is if someone is accused to be a traitor we have each of the following. The Accuser, The Judge and a Jury. If you believe someone is the traitor and you can convince enough people as to why, then we will hold a "Official" (Not really) Trial. The Accuser's job is to be the prosecuter and executioner, if they are wrong about the traitor then they will take the blame for the murder during the trial. The Judge is the one who doesn't vote, but will be the only one who knows who voted guility, innocent or abstaining. The Jury is the one who votes and decides the verdict and may be asked to give evidence for or against the "Traitor". If there are more guilty then innocent, the accuser may execute the person. If there are more innocent then guilty then the accused may go free. The "Accused" will be bound up by the people before a trial is intiated to prevent them from running away. Rules: 1. If the accuser is wrong, they will be executed during the class trials. 2. Being a judge doesn't mean immunity to trials. If a judge is accused a back-up will take there place, for that trial. 3. There must be at least some type of evidence to prove this person is the traitor. Either by actions, what they said or physical evidence before being voted up. 4. Judge must keep a record of votes.