Board Thread:Hosting Game/@comment-30105631-20161223222406/@comment-29669939-20170101150337

HAWAIIANpikachu wrote: ChickenPieNuggetz wrote: HAWAIIANpikachu wrote: ChickenPieNuggetz wrote: HAWAIIANpikachu wrote: ChickenPieNuggetz wrote: You guys are all going to die.

Stop trying to form teams and learn how to survive - YOU AREN'T GOING TO GET INTO A TEAM IF YOU CANT LIVE.

I'm going to go alone and live from now on ._. I know how to survive, I've studied. I would study more - Espicially what you are going to do in the later stages, and what contraptions you can create with wildlife. *has studied fishing, berries, plants, cooking, safely getting water, survival against bears, wolves, lions, deer, hand to hand combat, skinning, how to capture small game, etc.* You're taking this seriously O.o

That's good. Appearently "I'm not the smart one here" just because I think having less people is good, even though it means we don't need to take as much calories as a bigger group, move faster and leave less and quieter tracks.

At least I'm the one that has studied for every possible outcome. Travelling in depend on the environment you're in, and what's happening. In a survival type of roleplay, smaller groups do seem more logical, as you've just said - however I would not advise going alone, espicially if you have a role like mine (you don't have it so you're lucky). It will be much harder to get help, and you can do many more things in a bigger group then smaller.

But I would agree - Smaller Group > Bigger Group.